See the work around the model bill
Compare observed model and runtime spend per accepted-task equivalent. Show steering, retries, CI repair, review changes, rework, and defects only where coverage exists.
For Engineering Leadership
See where a coding-agent candidate earns broader use
Vendor charts show usage and token spend, but they cannot tell you whether the next setup will deliver accepted work across your repositories, review standards, and workload mix. Fullbeam reports accepted-task economics and keeps missing engineering-effort evidence visible on the decision trail.
What the release gate checks
The evidence behind the decision
Each result stays tied to the Stack Release, workload, repository state, and coverage that produced it. If evidence is missing, the gap remains visible in the release call.
Avoid one company-wide answer
A candidate can move to canary for routine maintenance, stay restricted for database migrations, and remain under evaluation for security-sensitive work until the sample grows and the missing runtime coverage is repaired.
Make the saving defensible
Show projected savings only where workload volume, cost attribution, evidence coverage, and outcome quality support the estimate.
Keep the decision trail
Each promotion, restriction, override, and rollback stays linked to the Stack Release, repository states, excluded cases, qualification policy, runtime coverage, and accepted outcomes behind it.
Bring us the next stack change
Spend less where the candidate is equivalent, and keep the stronger release on workloads where the lower-cost option still needs too much engineer help.
One current releaseOne candidatePrivate repository workA workload-level decision